 |
 |
Claim Construction And Interpretation - Part 3
Adapted from material written by
Dale S. Lazar, a Partner at
Piper Rudnick LLP
1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400
Reston, Virginia 20190-5159
Phone: 703-773-4149
Facsimile: 703-773-5064
email: dslazar@piperrudnick.com
In this third part, we explore that oddity of US claim practice - means-plus-function clauses, and how the CAFC says they must be interpreted. The clauses are easy and convenient to use, and many patent attorneys employ them in every mechanical or electrical application, and never have a second thought. They appear on their face to broadly cover an invention, but a close examination of recent CAFC cases shows that they are being interpreted extremely narrowly. Take this course and make your own decisions about when, and indeed if, you will ever use them again.
| Approved Jurisdictions |
Credit Hours |
Credit Type |
|
|
CA
CO
GA
NY
PA
TX
VA
| 1 |
Professional Practice |
|
|
|
 |
 |